Ontario’s Real Energy Plan

Folks outside Ontario’s electricity system can be excused for mistaking the provincial government’s revised Long Term Energy Plan (LTEP), issued earlier this week and reviewed here, as Ontario’s energy plan. As I argued previously, the LTEP is an election platform document rather than a program that drives action. Those interested in watching Ontario’s real energy plan need to look elsewhere.

Ontario’s real energy plan today is the ad hoc stream of consciousness on the spot guidance that the energy minister of the day bestows upon the agencies he controls.

In the case of the Ontario Energy Board and the Ontario Power Authority, the minister’s on the spot guidance is often set out in Directives. Here are the Directives issued to the OEB and the OPA.

In the case of Crown corporations OPG and Hydro One, they receive the minister’s guidance through Directives and also by way of ongoing direct supervision. Here are the Directives issued to OPG and Hydro One. The process by which the minister grants clearance for decisions and announcements is cloaked in secrecy.

Another way to track Ontario’s actual energy plan is to watch the projects getting approvals, such as these wind power projects checking off some of their last approval requirements.

Another way to track Ontario’s actual energy plan is to watch appointments to key positions within government-controlled agencies. Here is a recent commentary on appointment practices at the Ontario Energy Board.

2 Comments

  1. MasterResource, Dec.5,2013″The Great Green Lie: CCS Today Is Not Like Scrubbers in the 1970′s (Part I)
    The EPA anticipates that the proposed Carbon Pollution Standard/CPS will result in negligiable CO2 emissions changes by 2022.
    Future greenhouse gases wil come from other countries so the U.S. regulation will be relataively unconsequental.
    Things like the Carbon Capture are being pushed by groups that will derive some kind of financial benefit from them.
    The public is being bombarded with trash science and the public dosen’t know which is trash science and which is not.
    http://www.masterresource.org

    • In Part II of the above article:
      Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Beverly Hills) Calif. also sponsored Waxman-Markey Cap & Trade bill.
      Beverly Hills/ Hollywood types have a lot of money invested in “green” energy projects?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>